Archive

May 21, 2025

Browsing

In this video, Frank dives into some of his favorite features on StockCharts.com. He then dissects the S&P 500 and Bitcoin price action, before exploring the the XLK Technology ETF’s explosive move off the lows. He also highlights a few recent trade ideas and setups worth watching. Get trade ideas and chart setups worth watching in today’s technical review.

This video originally premiered on May 20, 2025.

You can view previously recorded videos from Frank and other industry experts at this link.

Despite economic and geopolitical upheaval, 2024 was relatively calm for platinum-group metals (PGMs).

In its new PGMs report, research firm Metals Focus notes that all five PGMs — platinum, palladium, rhodium, iridium and ruthenium — ended 2024 in physical deficit, marking a pivotal year of stabilization and supply strain.

With tightening mine output, rising hybrid vehicle demand and industrial shifts driving ruthenium and iridium gains, 2025 is set to test the sector’s resilience amid constrained supply and cautious investor sentiment.

As the sector looks to 2025, the outlook remains constrained but cautiously optimistic.

PGM supply constraints widen deficits

While all five PGMs were in physical deficit last year, overall mine supply did edge on 2 percent year-on-year.

However, Metals Focus notes that this figure masks underlying weaknesses.

Much of the gain stemmed from temporary factors, such as the release of work-in-process stockpiles, particularly in South Africa, which accounted for a significant portion of the PGMs inventory processed during the year.

Platinum mine supply rose 3 percent to 5.77 million ounces, mainly due to output from South Africa, whose production exceeded 4 million ounces for the first time since 2021. Yet stripping out the one-time work-in-process boost, global production was more than 1 million ounces below the 2010 to 2021 average of 14.95 million ounces.

For palladium, mine supply rose less than 1 percent, bolstered by modest gains in Russia and stock drawdowns in South Africa, even as Canadian output dropped 10 percent due to price pressure.

The report notes that production cuts in high-cost regions were inevitable, owing to closures like Sibanye-Stillwater’s (NYSE:SBSW) shutdown of Stillwater West and curtailed operations at East Boulder.

In total, platinum ended the year with a second consecutive shortfall. Palladium was short by 407,000 ounces, continuing a near-decade trend of tightness. Rhodium, ruthenium and iridium also closed the year with deficits of 178,000 ounces, 219,000 ounces and 49,000 ounces, respectively — an across-the-board supply squeeze not seen in years.

Demand for PGMs shifts under electrification and industrial dynamics

On the demand side, the automotive sector — the dominant consumer of PGMs — saw a 4 percent contraction in fabrication demand to 12.14 million ounces, the first such drop since the pandemic year of 2020.

The continued rise of battery electric vehicles (BEVs), which do not use PGMs in their drivetrains, contributed to a 2 percent decline in catalyzed vehicle output. Although BEV growth slowed to 9 percent — its weakest since the technology gained mainstream traction — its market share still rose from 12 percent to 13 percent.

Hybrids, however, offered a bright spot for PGMs, with production jumping 28 percent and often requiring heavier PGM loadings than traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. This helped cushion demand for autocatalysts, particularly platinum, which saw slower rates of palladium substitution as the price gap narrowed.

Platinum demand, in contrast, overall fell by 2 percent to 7.79 million ounces. Automotive and industrial usage were also dragged down by a 27 percent plunge in chemical applications, particularly in China’s paraxylene sector.

But jewelry demand surged 9 percent — its strongest growth since 2019 — driven by India’s booming export orders and Japanese consumers shifting from gold due to its soaring price.

Ruthenium and iridium, the lesser-known PGMs, also saw rising industrial relevance.

Ruthenium demand surged by 20 percent — reaching its highest level since 2006 — fueled by China’s caprolactam chemical sector and artificial intelligence-driven growth in hard disk drive production.

Meanwhile, iridium demand jumped 15 percent to a record 298,000 ounces, driven by ballast water treatment systems, acetic acid output, and early stage copper foil applications.

Palladium, long buoyed by ICE reliance, saw total demand fall 4 percent to 9.75 million ounces.

Automotive fabrication dropped 5 percent, with thrifting and substitution playing an increasing role, though the latter slowed due to narrowing discounts with platinum. Industrial use remained stable, down less than 1 percent, with electronics up 1 percent amid recovering consumer tech and AI hardware growth.

Recycling gains traction, but can’t fill supply gap

Secondary supply helped offset falling mine output, with autocatalyst recycling up 9 percent year-on-year.

Metals Focus largely attributes this gain to higher vehicle scrappage rates, improved new car sales and aggressive recycling incentives in China. Still, recycling fell short of restoring equilibrium.

Platinum secondary supply rose just 1 percent as jewelry recycling remained weak, with Chinese and Japanese flows down due to sustained low prices and reduced scrap availability.

Palladium fared better with a 9 percent increase — its strongest growth in five years — again led by China, where palladium dominates catalytic converter formulations.

Yet, even with these gains, total recycling volumes were insufficient to offset underlying shortfalls. Jewelry scrap fell by 29 percent for platinum and 45 percent for palladium compared to 2021, underscoring a structural shift in the recycling base amid changing consumer behavior and metal substitution.

PGMs prices stabilize, but caution prevails

PGMs prices stayed fairly in 2024, with volatility restrained.

Platinum traded within a tight US$850 to US$1,100 per ounce band, hovering mostly from US$900 to US$1,000.

Palladium, despite ongoing bearish sentiment, found support at US$900 per ounce, while rhodium stabilized around US$4,400 per ounce after collapsing from highs above US$29,000 in 2021. Meanwhile, iridium fell 12 percent in price over the year, though bargain hunters helped maintain a floor around US$4,000 per ounce.

Ruthenium rebounded 24 percent from September lows, ending the year supported by robust Chinese demand.

While the PGMs markets appear to be finding their bottom, the Metals Focus report emphasizes that the risk of supply squeezes and price spikes remains.

Indeed, short positioning on the CME contributed to sporadic rallies, especially for palladium. Net managed money positions averaged 1.05 million ounces short for the year, peaking at 1.63 million ounces in August.

Metals Focus’ 2025 PGMs outlook

Looking ahead, 2025 is expected to continue many of 2024’s trends.

Physical deficits will persist, particularly in rhodium, ruthenium, and platinum. Above-ground stocks (AGS) remain elevated for platinum and palladium, muting potential price rallies, but continued mine cutbacks could shift this balance over time.

Forecasts suggest platinum will average US$970/oz, up slightly from 2024. Palladium is expected to average US$930, down 5 percent year-on-year, while rhodium may rise 8 percent to US$5,000, supported by its deficit and scarce above-ground reserves.

Ruthenium is forecast to jump 26 percent to US$550, with iridium expected to average US$4,100, a 14 percent drop driven largely by 2024’s elevated base.

In sum, 2024 marked a transitional year for the PGMs—one of normalization rather than expansion. Supply remains tight, demand is recalibrating in the face of technological shifts, and investors are returning cautiously.

Whether 2025 brings further recovery or renewed disruption for the collective will depend not just on markets—but on mines, metals, and momentum-shifting market sentiment.

Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Thanks to exchange-traded funds (ETFs), investors don’t have to be tied to one specific stock. When it comes to biotech ETFs, they give sector participants exposure to many biotech companies via one vehicle.

ETFs are a popular choice as they allow investors to enter the market more safely compared to investing in standalone stocks. A key advantage is that even if one company in the ETF takes a hit, the impact will be less direct.

All other figures were also current as of that date. Read on to learn more about these investment vehicles.

1. ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (ARCA:SBIO)

AUM: US$80.23 million

Launched in December 2014, the ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF tracks small- and mid-cap biotech stocks that have one or more drugs in either Phase II or Phase III US FDA clinical trials. Its holdings must have a market cap between US$200 million and US$5 billion.

There are 100 holdings in this biotechnology fund, with about 60 percent being small- and micro-cap stocks. Its top holdings include Verona Pharma (NASDAQ:VRNA) at a weight of 5.31 percent, Alkermes (NASDAQ:ALKS) at 4.41 percent and Axsome Therapeutics (NASDAQ:AXSM) at 4.24 percent.

2. Tema Oncology ETF (NASDAQ:CANC)

AUM: US$63.67 million

The Tema Oncology ETF provides exposure to biotech companies operating in the oncology industry. It includes companies developing a range of cancer treatments, including CAR-T cell therapies and bispecific antibodies.

Launched in August 2023, there are 52 holdings in this biotechnology fund, of which about half are small- to mid-cap stocks and 4 percent are micro-cap stocks. Among its top holdings are Revolution Medicines (NASDAQ:RVMD) at a 6.05 percent weight, Roche Holding (OTCQX:RHHBF,SWX:RO) at a weight of 5.08 percent and Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE:LLY) at 4.87 percent.

3. Tema GLP-1 Obesity and Cardiometabolic ETF (NASDAQ:HRTS)

AUM: US$51.5 million

Launched in November 2023, the Tema GLP-1 Obesity and Cardiometabolic ETF tracks biotech stocks with a focus on diabetes, obesity and cardiovascular diseases. The fund was renamed on March 25 from Tema Cardiovascular and Metabolic ETF. More than three-quarters of its holdings are based in the US.

There are 47 holdings in this biotechnology fund, with about 75 percent being large-cap stocks and 18 percent mid-cap. Its top holdings are Eli Lilly and Company at a 9.92 percent weight, Abbott Laboratories (NYSE:ABT) at 4.77 percent and AstraZeneca (NASDAQ:AZN) at 4.14 percent.

4. ProShares Ultra NASDAQ Biotechnology (NASDAQ:BIB)

AUM: US$44.19 million

The ProShares Ultra NASDAQ Biotechnology ETF was launched in April 2010 and is leveraged to offer twice daily long exposure to the broad-based NASDAQ Biotechnology Index, making it an ideal choice “for investors with a bullish short-term outlook for biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies.” However, analysts also advise investors with a low risk tolerance or a buy-and-hold strategy against investing in this fund due to its unique nature.

Of the 268 holdings in this ETF, the top biotech stocks in the ETF are Gilead Sciences (NASDAQ:GILD) at a 6.06 percent weight, Vertex Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:VRTX) at 5.99 percent and Amgen (NASDAQ:AMGN) at 5.84 percent. Additionally, over a third of its holdings are in United States Treasury Bills.

5. Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares (ARCA:LABD)

AUM: US$43.42 million

The Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares ETF is designed to provide three times the daily return of the inverse of the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index, meaning that it rises in value when the index falls and falls in value when it rises. Leveraged inverse ETFs are designed for short-term trading and are not suitable to hold long-term. They also carry a high degree of risk as they can be significantly affected by market volatility.

The top three life science holdings in this ETF are Exact Sciences (NASDAQ:EXAS) at a weight of 2.23 percent, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:ALNY) at a weight of 2.15 percent and Neurocrine Biosciences (NASDAQ:NBIX) at 2.03 percent.

Securities Disclosure: I, Meagen Seatter, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Anteros Metals Inc. (CSE: ANT) (‘Anteros’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to report results from recent assessment work at its 100% owned Strickland VMS Property (‘Strickland’ or the ‘Property’) in southwestern Newfoundland. The work focused on the digitization and interpretation of multi-element geochemical data from historic trenching, advancing drill targeting efforts on this underexplored polymetallic volcanogenic massive sulphide (‘VMS’) system.

Prior to its public listing, Anteros commissioned the compilation, digitization, and 3D geological modelling of the Strickland VMS system in 2023 and 2024. This foundational work established a strong understanding of Property’s geology, alteration, and structure, and enhanced the understanding of multiple mineralized zones along a 1.4 kilometre trend (Figure 1). Since going public, Anteros has advanced the project through targeted follow-up, focusing on geochemical vectoring and priority zone refinement. The 2025 program confirmed compelling indicators of feeder-style alteration and mineralization in underexplored zones and highlighted several new high-priority exploration targets.

Mineralization Highlights:

  • Feeder-style alteration and mineralization confirmed: Compilation of 95 multi-element assays from 2012 trenching, integrated with historical drill data in 3D models, is helping to vector toward the potential VMS core and optimize future drill targeting.
  • Copper Zone: Now a high-priority target, with historical trench sampling returning up to 3.7% Cu and 3.25 g/t Au over 1 metre (Cu-C1, Table 1), alongside elevated cobalt and intense alteration – features consistent with VMS feeder conduits.
  • Gold Zone: Historical trenching returned 1-metre intervals up to 3.2% Cu and 1.32 g/t Au (Au-C1, Table 1), with alteration and elemental ratios indicating proximity to a hydrothermal center. This zone has never been drill-tested.
  • Main Zone and Main Extension: Historical trench samples demonstrate elevated Pb-Zn-Ag over extended strike lengths, consistent with stratiform VMS-style mineralization.

Table 1: Select 2012 Historical Trench Intercepts1 from Key Mineralized Zones

TRENCH ID ZONE FR. (m) TO (m) INT. (m) Cu % Pb % Zn % Ag g/t Au g/t
Au-C1 Gold 1.20 6.40 5.20 0.84 0.35 0.10 75.6 0.77
including Gold 5.40 6.40 1.00 3.20 0.50 0.35 131.0 1.32
Cu-C0 Copper 0.00 19.00 19.00 0.62 0.11 0.41 7.3 0.14
including Copper 0.00 5.00 5.00 1.65 0.09 0.08 13.3 0.32
including Copper 4.00 5.00 1.00 4.20 0.16 0.20 33.4 0.79
including Copper 7.00 12.00 5.00 0.30 0.33 1.42 9.9 0.11
Cu-C1 Copper 1.00 6.00 5.00 1.91 0.05 0.03 26.6 1.83
including Copper 2.00 3.00 1.00 3.70 0.05 0.01 43.2 3.25
Cu-C2 Copper 4.00 10.00 6.00 0.38 0.27 0.28 13.4 0.74
Cu-C3 Copper 0.00 4.00 4.00 0.69 0.40 0.25 42.9 0.26
M-C1 Main 0.00 4.00 4.00 0.03 2.05 3.96 262.6 0.30
M-C2 Main 2.20 5.20 3.00 0.03 1.19 0.24 123.5 0.16
M-C3 Main 0.00 2.20 2.20 0.04 1.93 0.13 452.9 0.31
MX-C1 Main Extension 0.00 3.75 3.75 0.10 2.10 3.86 152.2 0.06
MX-C2 Main Extension 0.00 1.40 1.40 0.11 5.14 8.95 311.6 0.40

1Trench intercepts are historic and may not be representative of true width

Figure 1: Property Location, Geology, and Mineralized Zones

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/9885/252765_5c0e3cf3b422294e_002full.jpg

‘The presence of multiple, mineralized zones along an over 1 kilometre trend indicates a significant VMS system,’ said Trumbull Fisher, Anteros CEO. ‘Specifically, the underexplored feeder-style alteration and high-grade gold-copper intervals of the Copper and Gold Zones have emerged as immediate exploration priorities.’

Next Steps

Building on the promising results to date, Anteros is planning a focused exploration program that includes:

  • Field verification of historical trench and drill collar locations to validate spatial accuracy
  • Integration of additional multi-element geochemistry into 3D models to refine and prioritize drill targets
  • Hyperspectral and induced polarization (‘IP’) surveying to image alteration halos and sulphide concentrations at depth
  • Diamond drilling of the Copper and Gold Zones, which remain largely untested despite returning high-grade trench results

About The Property

Strickland is held 100% by Anteros and is located approximately 85 kilometres south of Stephenville, within the Exploits Subzone of the prolific Dunnage Zone in central Newfoundland – an area renowned for hosting world-class VMS deposits. The Property hosts seven documented zones of copper (‘Cu’), lead (‘Pb’), zinc (‘Zn’), silver (‘Ag’), gold (‘Au’) mineralization along a 1.4 kilometre trend.

Mineralization at Strickland is interpreted to represent a bimodal-felsic (Kuroko-type) VMS system. Documented sulphide mineralization includes sphalerite, chalcopyrite, galena, and pyrite in high-grade polymetallic horizons-positioning the Property within the scope of Canada’s Critical Minerals Strategy.

In 1981, D.R. Prince of Falconbridge Nickel Mines Ltd. reported the following historical mineral inventories:

  • 260,000 tonnes at 195 g/t Ag and 5.25% combined Pb and Zn at the Main Zone,
  • 15,000 tonnes at 480 g/t Ag and 2% combined Pb+Zn at the Silver Hill Zone, and
  • 750,000 tonnes at 2% combined Pb+Zn at the Main Extension Zone

(Source: Falconbridge Nickel Mines Ltd., Internal Report, Geofile #011O/16/0139)

These estimates are considered historical in nature and were not prepared using current Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (‘CIM’) Definition Standards. A Qualified Person has not completed sufficient work to classify the historical estimates as current mineral resources, and Anteros is not treating them as current mineral resources. The Company considers these estimates relevant to the extent that they indicate the presence of significant mineralization and support continued exploration.

The reliability of the estimates is uncertain due to the age of the data, incomplete documentation of estimation methods, and the lack of modern QA/QC protocols. The original report does not provide specific cut-off grades, metal price assumptions, or a description of the estimation methodology. To verify or upgrade these estimates to current standards, Anteros would need to complete field validation of historic trench and drill collar locations, resample archived or in situ material using modern analytical methods, apply current QA/QC protocols, and complete a compliant geological model that supports estimation in accordance with CIM Definition Standards.

Since acquiring the Property in March 2022, Anteros has completed comprehensive digital compilation and geological modelling of historical data including airborne and ground geophysics, geological mapping, geochemistry, and over 7,000 metres of historical drilling and trenching.

More at www.anterosmetals.com/strickland.

Qualified Person

The technical content of this news release has been reviewed and approved by Jesse R. Halle, P.Geo., an independent Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (‘NI 43-101’).

About Anteros Metals Inc.

Anteros is a multimineral junior mining company applying data science and geological expertise to identify and advance critical mineral opportunities in Newfoundland and Labrador. The Company is currently focused on advancing four key projects across diverse commodities and development horizons. Immediate plans for their flagship Knob Lake Property include bringing the historical Fe-Mn Mineral Resource Estimate into current status as well as commencing baseline environmental and feasibility studies.

For further information please contact or visit:

Email: info@anterosmetals.com | Phone: +1-709-769-1151
Web: www.anterosmetals.com | Social: @anterosmetals

On behalf of the Board of Directors,

Chris Morrison
Director

Email: chris@anterosmetals.com | Phone: +1-709-725-6520
Web: www.anterosmetals.com/contact

16 Forest Road, Suite 200
St. John’s, NL, Canada
A1X 2B9

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This news release may contain ‘forward-looking information’ and ‘forward-looking statements’ within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. All information contained herein that is not historical in nature may constitute forward-looking information. Forward-looking statements herein include but are not limited to statements relating to the prospects for development of the Company’s mineral properties, and are necessarily based upon a number of assumptions that, while considered reasonable by management, are inherently subject to business, market and economic risks, uncertainties and contingencies that may cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by forward looking statements. Except as required by law, the Company disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/252765

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Bitcoin Pizza Day marks a significant event in the crypto industry’s history, as it resulted in the first-ever commercial payment transaction for this digital asset. As clear as its name, it has something to do with Pizza, and someone had paid 10,000 BTC for that. Interestingly, the same 10,000 tokens are worth nearly $1 billion today. Let’s discuss the key details. Bitcoin Pizza Day Celebrates Laszlo Hanyecz’s BTC Transaction The renowned Bitcoin Pizza Day is celebrated on May 22 and will mark the 15th anniversary tomorrow. It is celebrated by crypto enthusiasts and platforms all around the world, as the programmer Laszlo Hanyecz purchased two pizzas for 10,000 BTC, fifteen years ago. Not only did he buy Pizza with a digital currency, but he also marked the first commercial usage of BTC in history. Sources reveal that, on May 22, 2010, Hanyecz utilized 10,000 BTC, equivalent to $42 at the… Read More at Coingape.com

The post Bitcoin Pizza Day: Who paid 10,000 BTC for Pizza? appeared first on CoinGape.

Canary Capital has filed an amended version of its Solana ETF with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to improve the fund’s offerings. As part of the amendment, the asset manager has updated the ETF’s name to reflect its new partnership with Marinade Finance for SOL staking. Canary Capital Files Amended Solana ETF Prospectus A recent SEC filing shows that the asset manager has filed an amended version of the registration statement for its SOL ETF. As part of the changes, Canary Capital has changed the fund’s name to ‘Canary Marinade Solana ETF.’   As Bloomberg analyst James Seyffart noted, the amendment reflects the partnership with Marinade Finance for SOL staking in the ETF wrapper. The Solana DeFi protocol had also teased about the partnership yesterday, while hinting at a big announcement today. This development comes just as the US SEC delayed 21 Shares and Bitwise’s SOL ETF applications…. Read More at Coingape.com

The post Breaking: Canary Capital Amends Solana ETF Filing To Include SOL Staking appeared first on CoinGape.

Trading does grant excitement to earning money but functioning into a universe where errors could be costly. The learning curve might get steep, irrespective of choosing between trading stocks and futures or diving headfirst into the heads and tails fast-lane world of day trading. In reality, without proper guidance, you end up making crippling mistakes that will set you back in finances. Here comes the entry of a trading mentorship. A mentor will assist you in staying away from such errors and instruct you in the currently relevant methods and skills that will give you the upper hand. The process is all about knowing trading psychology and managing risk as much as it is about examining charts and making quick choices. Good mentoring can help you develop these abilities and steer clear of the pitfalls that usually surprise novice traders. How to Find the Right Mentor Trading mainly appeals because… Read More at Coingape.com

The post Trading Mentorship – How It Can Help You Avoid Costly Mistakes appeared first on CoinGape.

Earlier today, Solana announced Alpenglow, a major protocol upgrade designed to improve transaction speed and network efficiency. Unveiled by infrastructure firm Anza, a Solana Labs spinout, the new protocol aims to replace Solana’s current consensus mechanisms with a redesigned system. But the crypto community is curious: will it be as successful as the ETH Pectra upgrade? Solana Upgrade: The Road to Alpenglow Solana Alpenglow came into place as Solana’s network matured and the blockchain faced a surge in transaction volumes. This has caused congestion, which could be seen from its network outages on February 6, 2024, and multiple events in 2022. Another key issue was the complexity and latency of Proof of History (PoH) and Tower BFT. With the introduction of thousands of meme coins on Solana, the surge in transactions caused bottlenecks. 1/ Introducing the largest Solana Protocol change ever: Alpenglow, Solana’s new consensus protocol conceived by the Anza… Read More at Coingape.com

The post Can Solana’s Alpenglow Protocol Outshine Ethereum’s Pectra Upgrade? appeared first on CoinGape.

As US President Donald Trump and his family increase their engagement in digital assets, the cryptocurrency globe is abuzz with debate over transparency, regulatory control, and possible corruption. Their projects comprise two popular meme coins, $TRUMP and $MELANIA, a token-issuing exchange named World Liberty Financial, and American Bitcoin, a crypto mining company slated to go public backed by Eric and Donald Trump Jr. These endeavors, which have been reported to increase Trump’s net worth by nearly 40% — approximately $2.9 billion — are giving the Trumps unprecedented opportunities for financial influence, particularly given the anonymity and global reach of cryptocurrencies. For instance, at a recent private dinner for top $TRUMP meme coin holders, CNN reports that the top 25 holders were promised direct access to President Trump and a “VIP tour” of one of his private clubs. In an interview with CNN, Jordan Libowitz, the vice president for communications at… Read More at Coingape.com

The post Blockchain at a Crossroads: Trump’s Controversial Crypto Push vs. Graphite Network’s Transparent Future appeared first on CoinGape.